[ad_1]
When a shopper with severe knee surgical procedure issues was denied a long-term incapacity declare from one of many nation’s largest insurance coverage corporations, Michael Horrow and the workforce at Donahue & Horrow LLP have been in a position to safe a really favorable settlement to assist the shopper give attention to his restoration.
In December 2017, after a lifetime of laborious work, our then 58-year-old shopper was compelled to cease working after his third knee surgical procedure, as a result of issues from a revision of a previous left whole knee alternative. Whereas our shopper had been in a position to return to work after his prior surgical procedures, he by no means totally recovered from his third knee surgical procedure. He turned to his long-term incapacity provider and filed a declare for incapacity advantages below the ERISA-governed profit plan offered by his employer.
The insurance coverage firm agreed that our shopper was not in a position to work and initially authorised his incapacity declare. For the subsequent two years, our shopper repeatedly offered up to date medical data to the insurance coverage firm. This included data from rotator cuff surgical procedure and plans for a fourth left knee surgical procedure that needed to be delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
After 24 months of receiving advantages, the definition of incapacity modified, as is typical in ERISA-governed incapacity plans. Initially, our shopper solely needed to exhibit that he was unable to work the job that he carried out on the time of his incapacity, that of a manufacturing supervisor, to be able to qualify for advantages. Nonetheless, after two years, our shopper was required to point out that he couldn’t “carry out the duties of any gainful occupation” to be able to qualify for advantages. Instantly after the change within the definition of incapacity, our shopper continued to obtain month-to-month profit checks. Nonetheless, after three months, the insurance coverage firm arbitrarily and all of a sudden denied our shopper’s declare— as a result of an underqualified in-house nurse reviewer employed by the insurance coverage firm believed our shopper might return to work.
This led our shopper to strategy Donahue & Horrow LLP for assist with an enchantment of the wrongful denial of his declare. The Agency took over all communication with the insurance coverage firm and ensured that the insurer acquired all of our shopper’s up to date medical data in addition to experiences from a Useful Capability Evaluator and a Vocational Analyst additional supporting the declare.
When the insurance coverage firm refused to reverse its declare resolution on enchantment, Donahue & Horrow LLP filed an ERISA grievance in the USA District Courtroom for Central District of California’s Los Angeles courthouse. Finally the events carried out a mediation, throughout which the insurance coverage firm agreed to pay our shopper a considerable settlement in alternate for a dismissal of the lawsuit. With the settlement, our shopper was in a position to keep away from the uncertainties inherent in litigation and was additionally free of having to make month-to-month experiences to the insurance coverage firm relating to his medical situation. Now, utilizing the cash from his settlement, alongside together with his month-to-month Social Safety Incapacity Insurance coverage advantages, our shopper is ready to spend his time specializing in his restoration and spending time together with his household, moderately than combating with the insurance coverage firm.
In case you consider your incapacity insurance coverage, life insurance coverage, AD&D or long run care insurance coverage declare was improperly denied by your insurance coverage firm, name Donahue & Horrow LLP at (877) 664-5407 for a free session.
[ad_2]